Intocracy
In framing a government to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.

James Madison, Federalist 51

Intocracy is the form of governance which allows people to participate as people in governing themselves in relation to the ability to govern as people utilizing a spiragral approach where one can see evidence of all forms of government within government.

1. Systems of Government seek spiral fitness and design appropriate integral structures.

2. All structures are designed, built and maintained as open systems.

3. All forms are promoted through an understanding of stretch, but not dislocation from the spiral nature of the governing peoples governing the people.

4. People are encouraged to be who they are and when being who they are interferes with other's right to be who they are, there are actions taken according to the rules of the governing system, by the leaders in that system.

5. If the leaders in any system refuse to take power, accountability, authority and responsibility for the violations within their systems, the intocratic council will sanction the leaders, the government with a "time bound escalation of intervention" that no one can stop excepting the leaders and system being sanctioned--it is a "triggered sequence" of increasingly punitive measures by the world community.

6. The triggering of the escalation of PAAR begins with a warning that it has been triggered, which is then followed by the beginning of sanctions at the intocratic council, leaders are expunged from the council, then followed by economic sanctions, then followed by exile from a united nations, then followed by blockade, then followed by invasion, capture, trial and rebuilding by the civilary. In order to remain sovereign, the government must remedy the situation according to its own design, at first. If that doesn't succeed, escalating loss of sovereignty occurs as noted.

7. Each nation "earning" their way into the intocratic council by gradually moving itself along a development path agreed to by the IC as proposed by the UN will receive an escalating program of support defined by military peacekeepers, civilary, economic support, admission to the UN and finally representation on the intocratic council. (reverse of the punitive program)

8. All nations agree to a payment of support, fair trade as determined by their contribution and governance, acceptance and promotion of civilary and leadership development to support intocracy.

9. All nations agree to move towards the formation of an intocratic planetary system by 2025, with specific steps to be outlined by those governments rated on the intocratic scale at the highest levels.

10. Governments are judged by an intocratic index of development that is supported through the growth of the intocracy, formation of an intocratic council, a revised UN and IMF/World Bank and the creation of the civilary.

Setting of context with a story on taxation - the bain of any governance:

I've heard this analogy explained before, but this is the first time that I've seen a good, clear written explanation.  

Bar Stool Economics by David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. 'Since you are all such good customers, he said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

'I only got a dollar out of the $20,'declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!'

'Yeah, that's right,' exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!'

'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!'

'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.


The idea behind Intocracy from its pretender...Mike Jay

the question is, that given this situation, which i believe is mostly fair (you would NOT have heard this from me 10 years ago!), because i grew up poor as a democrat and married rich as a republican and now am not here, and no there...no where and now here...[notice the use of "space...]
 
the issue is the values, not the system...because the nature of things says that some people are valued as beautiful, some not, valued as tall, some short, valued as blue-eyed, some not...and the extrapolation remains (Spiral-Next contention) is that the nature of things in some people will be more aligned with the nature of things in business, society, civilization and some not...
 
if a tax structure is to be fair and "natural" then it would take into consideration the element that some are by their nature, or possibly the nature of their predecessors were in fact, more aligned (energenetically--another new word for nexters (substituting for epigenetically) and found it easy, or hard (even working hard is nature's gift, trust me on this) and so for whatever situation you can invent, i can show you a direct or indirect link to the nature of things, person or business...society or governance structure....
 
therefore, a social (civilization requirement?) obligation of the aligned and the productive is to provide a mere stipend for those who are not aligned--INCLUDING funding (not gifting) civilized ways of aligning the nature of things such that those unaligned can be aligned, so support of all kinds of activities--if the civilization wants bio-diversity--and this is thinking that we are not doing, except as a confrontational strategy to those who are both aligned and unaligned, pitting them against each other "false assumptions" (what would a mike jay rant be without a reference to blank slate, eh)...
 
yes, i agree we need design, and that it be natural, but not a design which "naturally" favors the aligned in opposition to the non-aligned...
 
so as you read the tax proposition below, understand, there is a value issue in that you don't beat up the racehorse, you care, and feed them and provide them with the nature of realizing their gifts, in order--not that they have, but they provide as to their nature, back to their nature, so that all might live with dignity...
 
i'm working on the last part of this, it's the toughest part, because we have to untangle the fabric of blank slate to remove the flawed assumptions that bind us...

mike

Civilary

The authors of the first paper on 4th Generation Warfare captured some of this strangeness when they predicted:

"The distinction between war and peace will be blurred to the vanishing point. It will be nonlinear, possibly to the point of having no definable battlefields or fronts. The distinction between 'civilian' and 'military' may disappear."

Link to 5G Blog here

Civilary is a stratified force of specially trained individuals form any country who operate on behest of the intocratic council. In the beginning, it becomes a governing body for all organizations on earth at all levels exporting relief in any form.

Grouping by level, although in all cases, combinations are deployed

[The following levels are identified through Spiral Dynamics]

Beige Team: Survival support and recovering, fast-acting intervention emergency actions and currently tied to FEMA-like structures, designed for in and out intervention to stabilize survival in calamity of any form. Used in conjunction with military interventions as dictated by intocratic law described above.

Purple Team: Short term support design like the Red Cross and NGOs as transitioning levels.

Red Team: Military invasion force, quit hitting strike force that kills the enemy while avoided non-military targets (marine recon, delta, seals, rangers, etc.) with lethal force. USMC becomes example of transitioning level.

Blue Team: Military forces coming in behind Red for longer term military presence with lethal and well as non-lethal weapons.*

Orange: Military Police force designed to promote the gradual introduction of spiral activity in the populous where military police are required to stabilize system with non-lethal weapons. National Guard in Reserve.

Green: Long term aid workers who work in areas that have been devastated, attacked by disease, famine and pestilence that require long term aid and rebuilding (peace corps as example)

Yellow: Intocratic intellectuals, scientists, governance, economists, bankers, entrepreneurial coaches, designers, professional innovators who are supplied and paid by intocratic council to provide a shot in the arm for jumpstarting economies, systems of delivery of services, etc.

Turquoise: Healers, gurus, pundits, mystics, artists and shamans who agree to support the growth of healing and development according to the ways of the people.

This civilary would often be deployed as a system and would draw from professionals who are paid, supported and trained by the yellow and turquoise levels to become civilary.

[AS a side note, the clear differentiation noted by reciprocal dynamics MUST be employed, where the intervention is designed to promote the most efficient combinations of content, context, conditions, code, culture and core attributes!]

Civilary would be a global force and would take applications from any country regardless of status. A rigorous stratified training system and qualification system designed to promote the growth of each individual in the civilary to the desired level of their contribution. Applications taken on a rotating basis so all countries could participate in sending members and a quota established based on the population of each country and the representation related to population of each country.

Countries according to intocracy would be those entities that are recognized through allowing people to be who they are at any level matched to the appropriate system.

Planatary visas would provide free moment among countries allowing people to move as immigration quotas allowed according to their "history" of peace contribution, non-peaceful participants would be limited in movement as well as electronically tagged for varying levels of probationary status depending on intocratic guidelines.

Access is allowed to internet kiosks in all parts of the world using 4G wireless system, accompanying " Diane-Link  " monitors identifying large value fluctuations in the consciousness through detection and the deployment of appropriate civilary to guard, support and deter or infuse events which would affect people being who they have a right to be.
 

*Non Lethal Weapons to be used for all Non Red Strike Force & Blue Protectors when possible Source | Read

To review the background in Intocracy, click here

Links:

  • Book resources here
  • Interesting Political Compass Info
  • Sovereignty Info
  • Panarchy here
  • 4th Generation Warfare OODA approach
  • Negative Interest" Currency: here
  • Future World Questions here
  • Beyond cheap labor: Lessons for developing economies here
  • New Strategy: Sense-making here
  • Global Ethics: 1993 Parliment of the World's Religions here
  • Global Corruption Index here
  • Einstein & Freud Letters here
  • New Rules Organization here
  • Institute for local self-reliance here.